Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add observer_thought_id to artifacts table #1341

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

wintonzheng
Copy link
Contributor

@wintonzheng wintonzheng commented Dec 6, 2024

Important

Add observer_thought_id to artifacts table and update models to include new columns and foreign key constraints.

  • Database Migration:
    • Adds observer_thought_id column to artifacts table in Alembic migration 2024_12_06_1819-fe49b59d836c_add_observer_thought_id_column_to_.py.
    • Creates foreign key constraint linking observer_thought_id in artifacts to observer_thoughts.
    • Adds user_input and observation columns to observer_thoughts table.
  • Model Changes:
    • Updates ArtifactModel in models.py to include observer_thought_id as a foreign key to observer_thoughts.
    • Updates ObserverThought in models.py to include user_input and observation columns.

This description was created by Ellipsis for 24b7838. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to fdb6a4f in 36 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 52 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_2yhoO3qLwhDm2UsN


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

def upgrade() -> None:
# ### commands auto generated by Alembic - please adjust! ###
op.add_column("artifacts", sa.Column("observer_thought_id", sa.String(), nullable=True))
op.create_foreign_key(None, "artifacts", "observer_thoughts", ["observer_thought_id"], ["observer_thought_id"])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's a best practice to name foreign key constraints. Consider providing a name for the foreign key constraint here.

@wintonzheng wintonzheng force-pushed the shu/add_observer_thought_id_to_artifact_model branch from fdb6a4f to d6185b9 Compare December 6, 2024 18:07
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on d6185b9 in 14 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 58 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. alembic/versions/2024_12_06_1751-b2b7b23646e9_add_observer_thought_id_column_to_.py:24
  • Draft comment:
    Consider making observer_thought_id non-nullable if the referenced column in observer_thoughts is non-nullable to maintain referential integrity.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Confidence changes required: 50%
    The foreign key constraint in the Alembic migration references a column that is nullable. This could lead to issues if the referenced column is not nullable in the observer_thoughts table.

Workflow ID: wflow_goSTFGAb0IUPsskq


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on 7e651b6 in 30 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 65 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_BxcSWOwZpqC9ixrh


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

def upgrade() -> None:
# ### commands auto generated by Alembic - please adjust! ###
op.add_column("artifacts", sa.Column("observer_thought_id", sa.String(), nullable=True))
op.create_foreign_key(None, "artifacts", "observer_thoughts", ["observer_thought_id"], ["observer_thought_id"])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider providing a meaningful name for the foreign key constraint instead of None for better maintainability and debugging.

@wintonzheng wintonzheng force-pushed the shu/add_observer_thought_id_to_artifact_model branch from 7e651b6 to 24b7838 Compare December 6, 2024 18:24
Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 24b7838 in 26 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 56 lines of code in 2 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 1 drafted comments based on config settings.
1. alembic/versions/2024_12_06_1819-fe49b59d836c_add_observer_thought_id_column_to_.py:29
  • Draft comment:
    Consider setting a default value for the new observer_thought_id column in the artifacts table to handle existing rows without this value.
  • Reason this comment was not posted:
    Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.

Workflow ID: wflow_brQONrd2Wpdsdwm8


You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@wintonzheng wintonzheng merged commit 3467382 into main Dec 6, 2024
2 checks passed
@wintonzheng wintonzheng deleted the shu/add_observer_thought_id_to_artifact_model branch December 6, 2024 18:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant